tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-213932218482113194.post3424960875801987922..comments2024-03-18T17:31:46.183-04:00Comments on Dan's Adventures in Taking on the Family Courts: Sometimes Ed says the craziest things.Dan Brewingtonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09813186050029927111noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-213932218482113194.post-65960185609916520982010-12-16T17:51:11.195-05:002010-12-16T17:51:11.195-05:00What "rules" are you talking about? The...What "rules" are you talking about? The rules according to the real law or the rules according to the crooked Indiana court system? If you are suggesting that writing about the Courts and Dr. Connor is keeping me from my children, then the rules need to be changed. What should I let go? Should I let go of the fact that Dr. Connor continues to try to harm me? Should I let it go that I caught the Indiana Supreme Court cheating by visiting my website? Amazing what IP address logs can do. The Indiana Supreme Court has been monitoring my website since May 27, 2010. Should I let someone else and/or their children be abused by Dr. Edward J Connor and the courts? Check with Eric Deters; he reported on 700WLW that Dr. Connor is a sick and twisted pervert. As for the privacy of the children's custody arrangement not being public; you're right. Give me the names of the parents or the children that Connor's recommendation referred to. I looked but I couldn't find any names. Actually, I couldn't find where I posted the children's custody arrangement; I only found where I stated that Judge Gayle Hoffman ignored Connor's ridiculous recommendation.<br /><br />As for stalking Dr. Connor, how have you come about that conclusion? I saw him at a court hearing that I was invited to attend. Other than that, I haven't seen him since the first day of the final hearing of my divorce on May 27, 2009. Is writing about his conduct considered stalking? Connor's harassed me on the internet because he can't sue me or have me arrested because I'm not the one acting in an illegal manner. That's why he runs to Judge Humphrey and Angela Loechel and cries about me whenever possible. I have proof if you need it. I'm the one who lost the ability to see my children and Connor is running and tattling on me at every chance. If any of my conduct is menacing, slanderous, or illegal, someone should call the police, sue me, and/or file for a restraining order. They won't do that because they know I haven't done anything wrong. Even Judge Humphrey was afraid to issue a restraining order against me because I would have the opportunity to defend it in Court. Why do you think Humphrey quit my case just a week before the June 13, 2010 hearing. He wasn't big enough to face someone who stood up against his crooked court. I would beat any restraining order just like I beat the restraining order my ex tried to place on me to remove my internet content. Gregory v Manning, Ind. Check it out. If the free speech doesn't harm the children or their mother; then it isn't bad. <br /><br />BTW, thanks for the well wishes.Dan Brewingtonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09813186050029927111noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-213932218482113194.post-24773644872606210812010-12-16T13:32:48.193-05:002010-12-16T13:32:48.193-05:00Although the hearing may have been open to the pub...Although the hearing may have been open to the public, the children's custody arrangement is not. You are also very close to stalking, as your posts indicate elsewhere that you intend to get Dr. Connor. From the outside, it looks like you will stir up the pot unless you let it go, and play by the rules. Just sayin...<br /><br />good luck to you. I hope you see your girls soon!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com