Monday, January 5, 2015

How Judge Humphrey and the State of Indiana rationalizes stripping parents of guns

Indiana Supreme Court Chief Justice Loretta H. Rush claimed I was dangerous because I refused to give my ex-wife a .357 Magnum handgun per my divorce decree as ordered by Dearborn County Judge James D. Humphrey.  Chief Justice Rush cited this as a explanation why Judge Humphrey had a justifiable reason to fear me. Judge Humphrey ordered I give my ex-wife my .357 Magnum because she said, "I had asked for it was because I don't even want it near our children."  My ex testified she had no gun training. She testified I had other firearms. When asked why she was worried about the .357 Magnum and not the other firearms I owned, she replied, "This is something that could be easily handled by our children. I want it out of their reach." When asked what she was planning to do with the .357 Magnum she replied, "Getting rid of it." When asked if she thought a young child could shoot a .357 Magnum, my ex replied, "I don't know." She testified she was unaware my daughter had ever fired anything other than a BB gun. During cross-examination I asked my ex, "Have they ever received any kind of medical attention for anything the respondent has done, you know, the dangerous activities that you accuse respondent of engaging in with the children?"  What was the response of my ex-wife?  "No, they have not."

That's why Judge James D. Humphrey ordered me to hand over a firearm to a person who was not even aware of whether a five year old was capable of shooting the .357 Magnum handgun my ex testified she had never seen.  No evidence of abuse, injury or neglect. She did not even claim my possession of a .357 Magnum caused her to fear me. The fact I did not give the .357 Magnum to an irrational parent was used against me to obtain criminal indictments, a conviction in a criminal trial, and was later used by Chief Justice Loretta H. Rush and the Indiana Supreme Court to rationalize upholding the convictions. There are no Second Amendment Rights in Indiana in a divorce. If you try to exercise your First Amendment Rights and complain about the actions of Indiana judges, you will quickly lose those rights as well.  Feel free to check out the above excerpts in pages extracted from the transcripts from my divorce. 

5 comments:

  1. How do you feel you've progressed thus far in your little fight? You are now a convicted felon who hasn't seen his kids in nearly six years. And you're a convicted liar. You sacrificed time with your kids all because you couldn't be a man and accept a court's ruling. Congratulations. You're a piece of shit and I am glad your kids have nothing to do with you.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You are a piece of shit who hides behind the tag "anonymous." Dan Brewington is a braver man than you or me! I have a story to tell about a corrupt and iincompatant Indiana judge but I don't dare for fear of jail and not being able to see my kids. What kind of a State is that? Its a Nazi, Fascist State and at least Mr. Brewington exposed that for a fact. He's more brave than you.

      Delete
  2. Is this illegal? I just told judge Stoltenburg, Brookings, South Dakota; on the phone in a private coversation that judge Means is a "corrupt bitch" and he said "are you threatening a judge?" I said that's not a threat and saying the word bitch is not against the law. He said he is going to have me investigated for threatening the judge ‪#‎waitingforthecops‪

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dan Brewington did more than say "bitch", he threatened a judge and lied to the grand jury.

      Delete
    2. Not sure Anon #1 there realizes that we can all get access to the court documents. I did, even here in Nebraska.

      While it's awful that your rights were violated and you were unlawfully jailed for years, I would be thankful that you got away from that vile creature. I'm a wife who occasionally considers divorce when stuff hits the fan, but I don't even posess the quantity of evil required to take my kids away from their father and get him locked up for years with false accusations.

      I hope you keep fighting and don't let this story fade into obscurity. The public needs to hear about judicial corruption and the harm women like that are doing to innocent people. You deserve to be with your children. ❤

      Delete